- このトピックでは、持っています 3 返信, 4 声, そして最後に更新されました 今 バイ
.
-
投稿
-
2014 will be THATCamp Philly’s 4th year. しかしながら, we have been having severe drop offs in attendance and pre-unconference participation the previous two years. We had our suspicions as to why, but surveyed organizers and participants to clarify why they were not coming and it was clear that many of the issues could be tied to fatigue with the unconference format. In order to try and answer these concerns and keep the event going we have decided to mix things up a bit, leaving/stripping unconference bits people liked/disliked while adding in traditional conference parts people appear to be missing.
We’re all fine with trying out this experiment this year, but it raised questions internally about whether or not it can still be branded as a THATCamp, so that is my question to the group. Below are how we are transforming things, so let us know what you think on the whole branding angle. The main concerns are with reduction (not elimination) of the self-organizing and spontaneous aspects. Not all of these changes are something outside of other THATCamps but I wanted to be complete:
-Moving from two day format (Fri/Sat) to one day format (Fri)
-Introducing a theme for the first time (TBD)
-Holding structured workshops in tracks throughout the day by pre-determined leaders
-Holding unconference sessions in simultaneous time slots with the workshops
-Adding additional networking opportunities during the day separate from sessions and workshopsThere are other changes but are more on the detail side. I would like to add that the organizing group is not closed and we always encourage new people to join. With the workshops in particular, しかしながら, we have had to start planning months in advance and the vast majority of attendees show no interest in working on organizing until they arrive at the event and even then it is iffy. Last year we had a real struggle getting people to propose unconference sessions ahead of time through the THATCamp’s site or the day of.
Those sound like characteristics of plenty of THATCamps that I’ve been too. Certainly there are themed THATCamps (e.g. THATCampデジタル教育学) and often THATCamps attached to conferences have a de-facto theme (例えば, THATCamp Mediaeval Congress, I imagine, had a distinctly medieval bent to it!).
Workshops by people with expertise in an area have also become common, のような these at THATCampNE. Different THATCamps have experimented with whether they are held on a single day, distinct from other sessions, or interspersed. Whatever works!
Speaking of single days, yep, there have been 1 day THATCamps, あまりに!
Additional networking time sounds completely in the spirit of THATCamp to me. I’d love to hear back more of what you have in mind, and how it worked, to pass on to other THATCamp organizers.
That’s a fairly long way round to say that, to me, this sounds completely in line with what you agree to when you 登録 a new THATCamp:
出席への無料または安価 (までの登録料 $30 米ドルは大丈夫です)
適用または登録を希望する人にOPEN (特定の機関のメンバーへの制限登記ん, 協会, 組織, 規律, またはランク)
オープンウェブ上で公開 (セッションはブログすることができます, Twitterに, 撮影, 記録された, そして投稿)
自己編成 (全くプログラム委員ません: すべての参加者が一緒に議題を設定します, 前またはアンカンファレンス中のいずれか)
参加型で自発 (ほとんどのセッションは、グループディスカッションです, 生産的な共同作業セッション, いかなる種類のまたは楽しいコラボレーション; いずれかが用意している場合、いくつかがあるはずです, monologuingプレゼンテーション, 論文, 技能訓練のワークショップを除く、またはデモ, さらにはワークショップでは、一般的に、グループで実践的な演習を可能にすべきである)I agree, it sounds like a THATCamp to me! As Patrick notes, the important things are that it is significantly hands-on, public and that the participants have a majority voice in making or altering the agenda.
Belatedly, Matt, I’d also say that yes, 確かに, it still sounds like a THATCamp to me, and as Patrick noted, as long as you meet the five requirements on the THATCamp Registry page, you can call it a THATCamp.
It might be a good idea to break those five rules out and put them somewhere a bit more prominent — some kind of “Requirements” または “Is it a THATCamp” ページ, maybe …
- あなたは、このトピックに返信するにはログインする必要があり.
