这还算是一种THATCamp?

[马特·休梅克]

2014 will be THATCamp Philly’s 4th year. 但, we have been having severe drop offs in attendance and pre-unconference participation the previous two years. We had our suspicions as to why, but surveyed organizers and participants to clarify why they were not coming and it was clear that many of the issues could be tied to fatigue with the unconference format. In order to try and answer these concerns and keep the event going we have decided to mix things up a bit, leaving/stripping unconference bits people liked/disliked while adding in traditional conference parts people appear to be missing.

We’re all fine with trying out this experiment this year, but it raised questions internally about whether or not it can still be branded as a THATCamp, so that is my question to the group. Below are how we are transforming things, so let us know what you think on the whole branding angle. The main concerns are with reduction (not elimination) of the self-organizing and spontaneous aspects. Not all of these changes are something outside of other THATCamps but I wanted to be complete:

-Moving from two day format (Fri/Sat) to one day format (Fri)
-Introducing a theme for the first time (TBD)
-Holding structured workshops in tracks throughout the day by pre-determined leaders
-Holding unconference sessions in simultaneous time slots with the workshops
-Adding additional networking opportunities during the day separate from sessions and workshops

There are other changes but are more on the detail side. I would like to add that the organizing group is not closed and we always encourage new people to join. With the workshops in particular, 但, we have had to start planning months in advance and the vast majority of attendees show no interest in working on organizing until they arrive at the event and even then it is iffy. Last year we had a real struggle getting people to propose unconference sessions ahead of time through the THATCamp’s site or the day of.

[帕特里克·默里 - 约翰]

Those sound like characteristics of plenty of THATCamps that I’ve been too. Certainly there are themed THATCamps (e.g. THATCamp数字教育学) and often THATCamps attached to conferences have a de-facto theme (例如, THATCamp Mediaeval Congress, I imagine, had a distinctly medieval bent to it!).

Workshops by people with expertise in an area have also become common, 喜欢 these at THATCampNE. Different THATCamps have experimented with whether they are held on a single day, distinct from other sessions, or interspersed. Whatever works!

Speaking of single days, yep, there have been 1 day THATCamps, 太!

Additional networking time sounds completely in the spirit of THATCamp to me. I’d love to hear back more of what you have in mind, and how it worked, to pass on to other THATCamp organizers.

That’s a fairly long way round to say that, to me, this sounds completely in line with what you agree to when you 注册 a new THATCamp:

免费或便宜出席的 (高达登记费 $30 美元的罚款)
开到任何人谁希望申请或注册 (特定机构的成员没有限制注册, 协会, 组织, 纪律, 或秩)
公众开放的网络上 (会话可以在博客, 吱吱喳喳, 拍下, 记录, 并张贴)
自组织 (没有程序委员会: 所有参与者将共同制定议程, 之前或在非会议期间)
参与性和自发性 (大部分会议是小组讨论, 生产合作工作会议, 或任何形式的合作欢畅; 应该有几乎没有任何准备, monologuing简报, 文件, 或示威除外技能培训班, 甚至工场一般应允许动手练习的组)

[亚兰糖Scharff]

我同意, it sounds like a THATCamp to me! As Patrick notes, the important things are that it is significantly hands-on, public and that the participants have a majority voice in making or altering the agenda.

[阿曼达法国]

Belatedly, Matt, I’d also say that yes, 的确, it still sounds like a THATCamp to me, and as Patrick noted, as long as you meet the five requirements on the THATCamp Registry page, you can call it a THATCamp.

It might be a good idea to break those five rules out and put them somewhere a bit more prominent — some kind of “要求” 或 “Is it a THATCamp” 页面, maybe …

[马特·休梅克]

Thanks all. We figured it was ok but wanted to check since we do think we are bending the 4th and 5th rules.

[作者]

帖子