<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Joys of RDF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thatcamp.org/2008/05/the-joys-of-rdf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thatcamp.org/2008/05/the-joys-of-rdf/</link>
	<description>The Humanities and Technology Camp</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Knox</title>
		<link>http://thatcamp.org/2008/05/the-joys-of-rdf/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Knox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatcamp.org/?p=13#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I'm not using RDF (other than playing with some of the Simile tools) but would like to hear the experience of people who are. If anybody has given any thought to Topic Maps, I would be interested in talking about that as well, either in comparison to RDF or independently. There are a couple of project ideas where I have thought Topic Maps would be an excellent fit conceptually, although the F/OSS tool situation there has its own challenges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not using RDF (other than playing with some of the Simile tools) but would like to hear the experience of people who are. If anybody has given any thought to Topic Maps, I would be interested in talking about that as well, either in comparison to RDF or independently. There are a couple of project ideas where I have thought Topic Maps would be an excellent fit conceptually, although the F/OSS tool situation there has its own challenges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asolove</title>
		<link>http://thatcamp.org/2008/05/the-joys-of-rdf/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>asolove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thatcamp.org/?p=13#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I would love to see at least two sessions: one a tutorial on the basic RDF data model for those who might have to make decisions, and a second developer chat about the tools people are using for working with RDF. Most of the existing tools have a fairly steep learning curve that goes beyond RDF and into different implementation strategies and feature subsets. It might help if we could get together a list of RDF tools people are using and do a quick rundown of the trade-offs. If people want to get even deeper, we might explore web serving solutions, dereferencing, federation, etc.

Would you might posting/commenting on the tools you are currently using in these areas?

Thanks,

Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see at least two sessions: one a tutorial on the basic RDF data model for those who might have to make decisions, and a second developer chat about the tools people are using for working with RDF. Most of the existing tools have a fairly steep learning curve that goes beyond RDF and into different implementation strategies and feature subsets. It might help if we could get together a list of RDF tools people are using and do a quick rundown of the trade-offs. If people want to get even deeper, we might explore web serving solutions, dereferencing, federation, etc.</p>
<p>Would you might posting/commenting on the tools you are currently using in these areas?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
